-
Xでシェア
-
Facebookでシェア
-
LINEでシェア
-
LinkedInでシェア
-
記事をクリップ
-
記事を印刷
Why strategy has so many meanings
Strategy can be both difficult to understand and to discuss. People use the same term to refer to quite different things: a plan for a business’s future, a move to outmanoeuvre a competitor, or an organisation’s reason for being. The strategy scholar Jay Barney was only mildly exaggerating when he observed in 2002 that there are as many definitions of strategy as there are books on it.
This multiplicity of meanings is not a product of confusion. It reflects how strategic management, as an academic discipline, has expanded its reach over the past half-century. Each era addresses a particular question. When new phenomena expose the limits of that answer, the next era poses another. Strategy has developed through these successive layers of understanding.
Consider portfolio analysis, which combined declining costs associated with cumulative production with the rate of market growth. It offered a powerful explanation under the stable conditions of rapid economic growth and remains useful today. But as growth slowed and industries diversified, new questions arose that the framework had not anticipated. Similarly, theories that located competitive advantage in internal resources explained why companies in the same industry perform differently. They also raised deeper questions: Where do those resources come from, and how are they renewed?



